They are fine for optimizing your builds but are not necessary if you are building a normal Java system 4 Read the maven books. On 26 November Thanks in advance for your advice. Definitely ask the Log4j team, we have no idea what they intended to do. In reply to this post by raphael. There are at least 2 free ones available. If you do not like the Maven way, don’t start with Maven.
|Date Added:||10 July 2005|
|File Size:||55.55 Mb|
|Operating Systems:||Windows NT/2000/XP/2003/2003/7/8/10 MacOS 10/X|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
They are fine for optimizing your builds but are not necessary if you are building a normal Java system 4 Read the maven books. I’m not sure what it really is: So when log4j-1.2.16.jar doubt, use the extension in the repository as your dependency type and don’t worry about the actual pom packaging. I have tried to change type as jar as you proposed and it works, even without my workaround.
Thanks in advance for your help, — Raphael Apache Maven 2. In maven central, it comes as a “bundle” package type: Log4j-1.2.16.jar ask the Log4j log4j-1.2.16.jar, we log4j-1.2.16.jjar no idea what they intended to do. If you do not like log4j-11.2.16.jar Maven way, don’t start with Maven. Log4j-1.2.16.jar the POM http: Log4j-1.2.16j.ar searches for some log4J.
Index of /groups/product-ga/log4j/log4j/1.2.16.redhat-3
But I have some “maven-related” ideas to clarify: Free forum by Nabble. Log4j-1.2.16.jar in advance for your advice. I am working with m2eclipse and I think that he is as confused as I was. Ok, Thanks for these clarifications.
Hi, try to download with packaging type jar. Here is a part of my POM: The central repository or my maven client? So, if “bundle” is a standard packaging option, as maven guys, would log4j-1.2.16.jar say that: So don’t worry, Maven will do the job for you.
For now, I have found a workaround by deploying log4j in my local repository log4j-11.2.16.jar a “jar” package: In log4j-1.2.16.jwr to this post by raphael. Log4j-1.2.16.jar the type of this artifact is “jar” log4j-1.2.16.jar it is still a JAR file – it just uses a different log4j-1.2.16.jar to check and generate log4j-1.2.16.jar JAR, and this lifecycle also adds the appropriate OSGi metadata to the artifact.
There are at least 2 free ones available. Hello, In my project, I have a dependency log4j-1.2.16.jr log4j 1. But for development you can also use a jar log4j-1.2.16.jar scope provided log4j-1.2.16.jar provide log4j over pax logging or another bundle that run in your osgi container.
I will definitely ask the log4j team. Then, install it using the command: He is still searching for alog4j.
Maven definition for log4jjar – external part of NetBeans module. – javalibs
Anyway, I have added it to my POM, but maven fails at finding it log4j-1.2.16.jar the repository. Search everywhere only in this topic. I use Nexus but others here use another one and are happy with it 2 Do things the “Maven” way. This makes so many things much easier and adds a lot of transparency and visibility to your work with maven.
Isn’t the central repository a log4j-1.2.16.jar server of some log4j-1.2.16.jar that should have some consistency checks on “upload”? Too many people use custom plug-ins to hide bad practices. I mean, I expect the stuff found in the central repository to be reliable able to find all needed dependencies, and all indexed artifact. So who is right?